Green internet?

I've been reading a lot lately about how the internet is going green. "Green"? I say. They'll put that green spin on anything to sell something. I remember when computers started being used in offices and people were starting to be able to afford them, and the promises that it would save paper and time. Well, frankly, that didn't pan out. As much as I try, I think there is more paper printed than ever before.

So I couldn't really understand how the internet wasn't green already, apart from the pile of paper that we waste trying to print something out.

Well, apparently when you think about it, our computers use quite a bit of energy. We are all switching to flat screen monitors that are meant to be energy efficient, and turn them off completely when we aren't using them, right? What about the servers that we connect to in order to see those gazillions of websites? Now that is where the energy is really being consumed.

How are they consuming so much energy? All of our banking, google searches are done through Data Centres. these are generally a facility used to house computer systems. A moderate sized data centre will consume about 1 megawatt of electricity, but many of the larger facilities like Google can require more than 20 megawatts to keep it running. That's enough to power 15,000 homes. These larger data centres have computer servers that are packed into warehouses. The servers heat up so need a large amount of electricity first of all just to cool them using air conditioning. Lighting will also use up electricity. And the busier these servers get, the more electricity that is needed as more heat is generated.

So a lot of these companies are trying to reduce their costs as well as trying to reduce their footprint. A company called Peer 1 is starting work on a new data centre in Scarborough that they say will be their largest facility and it's most efficient. And the way it will do it won't add much to their building costs. They'll pump in cold air from outside (this is Canada, after all) for most of the year to cool their servers. At the same time the heat from those servers will by recycled and vented to offices in the building that need heating, eliminating the need to pay for heating. They will construct barriers to keep the areas that need to be cool from those that need to be warm. They will also have a "cool roof", which is a roof made of light coloured material that will reflect the sun, rather than absorb it. They are also considering a rainwater collection system as a way to irrigate their surrounding property.

These sound like sensible ideas without a solar panel or wind turbine to be seen. It would be nice to see in the next decade or so, these ideas becoming the norm for regular properties, not just energy gobbling companies.

New Search er Decision Engine

There is a new "decision" engine out called Bing that is apparently a replacement for Live Search. It looks a lot like Google, only with a pretty picture in the background. I'm not sure if that changes every day, as I only found it. I did a quick search and it came up with what I wanted. So that's something. Robert X Cringely (I'm not sure if that is his real name, but he's pretty humorous)writes a pretty funny review of it.

He mentions another "decision engine" called Hunch that asks you a lot of questions in order to help you make a decision about something. Doesn't sound like the time it would take, and it could help them with selling your answers somewhere down the line.

Just ask your Mother, she's likely keen to tell you what to do anyway.

Canada falling behind

The OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) released a report that revealed that Canada has one of the slowest and most expensive consumer broadband networks in the developed world. Canada was compared with 29 other countries on a range of metrics. These included broadband availability, pricing, speed and bandwidth caps. At first our numbers don't seem so bad with Canada ranking 9th out of 30 countries for broadband penetration.

"Yet, the situation becomes far more troubling once the OECD delves deeper into Canadian pricing and speed.
Canada is relatively expensive by OECD standards, ranking 14th for monthly subscription costs at $45.54 (US) compared to $30.46 (Japan) and $30.63 (UK). This high price may explain why many Canadians with access to broadband are choosing not to subscribe." Michael Geist

Mixhael Geist has gone before the Standing Committee on Transport and Communications to discuss the state of telecommunications in Canada. And his speech is posted here. As he says, "Canada was once a global leader, yet today the marketplace suffers from high prices, slow speeds, and throttled services that have led to a decline in comparison with peer countries."

When price and speed are compared, that is when Canada slides to the bottom of the list, ranking 28th out of 30 countries, only ahead of Mexico and Poland.

To read the OECD press release (but not necessarily understand it the first time round) click here.